From There… To Here

The social history of Wester Hailes


DARKNESS, DAMPNESS, DILAPIDATION AND DESPAIR

Pat Rogan, who has just died aged 92 and whose obituary we carried two weeks ago, was a local politician of pivotal significance in the drive to transform Edinburgh’s housing conditions in the mid-twentieth century. He spearheaded a major programme of slum clearance in the central areas of the city and the provision of thousands of new homes which included the building of Wester Hailes.

I had the pleasure of interviewing Mr Rogan a couple of years ago when carrying out some initial research into the history of Wester Hailes. He was good enough to give me a copy of a speech he had delivered to a housing conference entitled: Rehousing The Capital – The Crusade Against Edinburgh’s Slums, and I’ve included below a number of extracts from it which give a vivid insight into the huge problems and challenges which had to be addressed.

Then 90, he spoke quietly with controlled passion as he recounted stories about the appalling conditions that many in Edinburgh were living in half a century ago – filth, disease, vermin infestation and buildings in such disrepair that, in some cases, walls were literally falling down about people’s ears. Just how bad the state of the slum housing was became starkly apparent to him within a few weeks of being first elected in 1954.

“One very wet and windy night, a deputation, consisting of half a dozen folk from a tenement in the Canongate, arrived at my door. Their roof was looking badly, their houses were almost flooded and what was I going to do about it? I didn’t know what to do, but I accompanied them back to their homes so that I could see the extent of the damage. I found their complaints were not exaggerated. People were huddled in corners trying to avoid the worst of the downpour, while efforts had been made to protect their belongings, especially their bedding. Among those unfortunates was a young mother who that very day had returned from hospital with her new-born babe.”

Trying to find help, he went to the local police station only to discover that there were no emergency services to deal with the problem although complaints about leaking roofs came in every time there was heavy rain. In order to do something to try and alleviate the situation, Pat opened up the yard of the building firm which he managed, found a couple of tarpaulins, took them up onto the roof, and, “with the help of a couple of men from the tenement, spread them over the worst of the rotten slates”. That was all he could do there and then but it was the night Pat Rogan’s crusade began.

Immediately, he set out to find why such conditions were tolerated.

“The first thing I discovered was that the owners had abandoned the property because they were unable to meet the maintenance costs…I also discovered that, throughout Edinburgh, scores of tenements had been deserted and, in some instances, whole streets of properties had been abandoned by their owners. Meantime, City officials were trying, in a half-hearted way, to trace the owners and serve notices regarding their duty to keep their houses wind and watertight. As many of the owners had left the country, the task of finding them was almost impossible, and, as the Corporation was most unlikely to be compensated for repairs, the unfortunate occupiers of the run-down houses were left marooned.”

The Planning Department informed Pat to his disgust that no clearance and rebuilding work was envisaged in his Holyrood ward for at least twenty years. But the situation was about to change because of a near-disaster which received wide publicity and highlighted the highly dangerous state of many of the slums. In Pat’s ward there was an abandoned building in Beaumont Place whose owner had refused to carry out repairs and, instead, had offered it to the Corporation for the price of one penny. Because of this it became known as the “Penny Tenement”. One night in 1959, a large bulge appeared in the gable wall of the Penny Tenement and a few hours later it collapsed. Luckily none of the occupants were killed but Pat was quickly off the mark to follow up the implications:

“In the City Chambers, I asked the Town Clerk who would be responsible if anyone was killed or injured in a similar mishap. A week later, he came back with the legal answer that Edinburgh Corporation would be responsible! This information sent alarm bells ringing, so immediate inspections on all doubtful properties were ordered by the City Engineer. This move brought quick results and, within nine days, 101 families were removed from dangerous homes and re-housed in safer surroundings.”

The programme of slum clearance had been well and truly kickstarted and Pat was in the forefront of it over the coming years.

“All in all, that was a most exciting time. Everyone was caught up in the hectic job of finding new homes. The enthusiasm of our officials was marvellous and previous apathy was cast aside. The urgency of indentifying dangerous buildings went on at a high speed and the Dean of Guild Court, of which I was a member, was in constant demand to visit suspect properties and adjudiacate, where necessary, over disputes regarding their stability.”

However, that was only half the answer. Lots of new homes had to be provided and there was a serious shortage of building land. In 1962, Pat became Chairman of the Housing Committeee and this was the first challenge that he faced.

“In the immediate post-war years, Edinburgh had erected 4,000 prefabs – the largest number of any city in Scotland – and these houses were occupying valuable land, at a very low density. It was estimated that, by removing them, we could build 10,000 houses on the sites made available.”

This policy was not popular in certain quarters, not least amongst the prefab tenants themselves but Pat saw to it that a programme of demolition and rebuilding was swiftly implemented: “the need for houses was great and the reward was a production of houses never before achieved in Edinburgh”.

It was as part of this programme that the present-day Calders was built on the site of an old prefab scheme. But the redevelopment of those sites could  not, on its own, provide the massive amount of housing needed to replace the slums. It was then that Housing Committee turned to available greenfield sites on the periphery to make up the shortfall, the largest of which was Wester Hailes.

In previous articles on this blog we have highlighted the flaws in the system-building solutions utilised by some contractors in order to construct Wester Hailes as quickly as possible. But the tremendous pressures Council leaders such as Pat Rogan were under to get people out of slum conditions with the minimum of delay should not be forgotten. At the time, those methods of construction seemed to offer an infinitely preferable solution to the set-up that Pat inherited when he took office.

“… the whole situation was aggravated by a slow-moving house building programme. The method of tendering for new housing didn’t help matters. At that time, tenders were accepted on an individual trade basis with each contractor, or sub-contractor, responsible for his own work, the overall control or supervision being left to the officers of the Town Council. This involved the Town in arithmetical checking of all these separate tenders before contracts could be awarded. But, worse, at the monthly progress review, we were told repeatedly that delays were caused by certain contractors who, impeding the whole works, would blame lack of labour, shortage of materials, or lack of cooperation from other trades. I was instrumental in having this changed, so that one main contractor was appointed. He was held responsible for all sub-contract work and would be answerable for delays or bad workmanship.”

And, as to the other main charge laid against the Council when Wester Hailes was first built – the almost total lack of facilities – Pat Rogan, for one, had been well aware of the vital importance of providing these and, in his speech, he offered a revealing explanation as to why, despite his position as Chair of the Housing Committee, it never happened.

“In retrospect, many improvements could have been made on the housing crusade of thirty years ago. Unfortunately, wholesale developments were not controlled entirely by the Housing Committee. In preparing a large scheme, land had to be allocated for a school but , time and time again, and years later the land was not used. Requests to include libraries, community centres and recreation facilities were never received from those committees and provision of shops – the responsibility of the Finance Committee – was usually left to the good sense and judgement of the City Architect. This mean that many new housing estates were deprived, at the beginning, of amenities that would have made life more comfortable.”

To me, hearing Pat speak and reading his words was a salutary reminder of the enormity of the problem and all the pressures and constraints he, and those working with him were faced with as they laboured to wipe Edinburgh clean of its terrible slums. To many people nowadays, the conditions in these would be almost unimaginable. They are perhaps best summed up by Pat himself quoting conversations with one of his officials:

“When discussing housing with him, he often spoke to me about one of his predecessors…who defined a slum as “Darkness, Dampness and Dilapidation”. I have not heard a better description, unless one adds the word “Despair”.

– Roy McCrone


FISH TALES

January 1982. It was a day of icy cold and blizzards. It was the day the Sentinel chose to be out and about in Wester Hailes to see some of FISH’s neighbourhood workers in action and meet just a few of the residents who relied on them. The weather may have been terrible but the conditions created a perfect illustration of how vitally important the help provided by this small team of dedicated workers was to the community they served. Every one of the people visited was over 75 years old and, because of the weather, stuck in their homes unable to venture out, vulnerable and isolated.

Here’s a sample of the stories the Sentinel recounted from that day:

>>> Mr Turton was living in only one room of his house and the temperature had dropped so low in his kitchen that the pipes had frozen and he had no water. FISH’s Jane Straiton got on the case right away reporting the problem to the Council’s Maintenance Department and then, because they were unable to deal with it immediately, arranged for his neighbour to provide him with water in the meantime.

>>> Mr and Mrs Murray had requested a visit and were delighted that Jane had been able to call despite the snow. Mrs Murray was bedridden and told the Sentinel “It is great to see a nice friendly face when Jane pops in. It’s nice to know somebody cares”.

>>> Ann Dow visited Mrs Dodds who said how much she’d enjoyed the Christmas party organised by the Dumbryden Association of Tenants. She had hurt her hips after a fall in her house resulting in a lengthy stay in hospital followed by a period of convalescence at home which meant that she hadn’t been out for nearly a year. Ann had organised a car to pick Mrs D up, take her to the party and bring her home afterwards.

These may have been only small acts in themselves but were exactly the help and support the elderly residents wanted and needed – the sort of one-to-one contacts and personal kindnesses that overstretched authorities with the whole of Edinburgh to cover couldn’t begin to replicate.

However, the sad irony was that at the very time the article was written, FISH was facing the possible loss of the grant funding it had been receiving from Lothian Regional Council because of large cuts in government expenditure. Last week we suggested that FISH exemplified much of what is now being touted as answers to society’s percieved ills. It’s true that communities are capable of doing a lot for themselves but then, as now, only if their individual local projects and initiatives receive adequate support. Make funding cuts too deep, try and stretch the resources that are left beyond realistic limits and any chance of a “Big Society” will be lost and many areas will remain blighted for years to come.


MORE THOUGHTS ON ROBERT

Two weeks ago we ran a post about an interview in the Sentinel, back in 1986, with Robert Maxwell, the newspaper owner and tycoon who, in his time, was just as famous and powerful as Rupert Murdoch.

Following that, we were very fortunate to be able to make contact with Stewart McRobert who conducted the interview entitled “The Thoughts of Robert”. Stewart has kindly taken the time to set down for us his memories of meeting the great man and it provides a fascinating postscript to the published piece. Many thanks Stewart.

“Although by no means the biggest shock in the hacking scandal, it was still a surprise when Rupert Murdoch described his time in front of the UK Parliament’s Culture, Media & Sport Committee as “the most humble day in my life”.

After all, humility isn’t the first quality you’d associate with a globe-bestriding press baron. And there was certainly none on show when I came face-to-face with Robert Maxwell after he’d “saved” the ’86 Commonwealth Games.

It was a long time ago and memories fade, but a couple of impressions remain. The first is that during our interview Cap’n Bob was charm personified. He was boastful, of course. But his bravado was always delivered with a smile and in an entirely reasonable tone.

On the other hand, before we sat down to talk, he displayed another side to his complex personality…

I’d met his entourage in the reception of a city centre office block (Canning House, if I remember correctly). We got in a lift and then searched out a space to carry out the interview. Maxwell led the way, with his retinue trailing behind.

He spotted a room and barged in – I was a bit surprised to see several high powered looking businessmen in the middle of a meeting. They were taken aback; he ignored them.

Cap’n Bob sat down and made himself ready for the interview. The businessmen’s shock turned to sheepishness, they gathered up their things and traipsed off to find another room to carry on their meeting.

I’m no psychologist, but I believe these two episodes provide an insight into the character (and success) of Robert Maxwell and his like: one minute arrogant, rude and dominating, the next sweet, good-natured and easy going.

I guess the ability to be humble comes later when you’re over 80 and one of your businesses is found to have been involved in some very shady practices.”

– Stewart McRobert, 2011


A CERTAIN “R.M.” – MEDIA MOGUL

In 1986, Rupert Murdoch was, as now, at the centre of a raging political storm. He was in the process of breaking the power of the print unions irrevocably during the “Battle of Wapping” industrial dispute – an early demonstration of the totally ruthless, diamond-hard ambition which has brought him to where he stands today.

But, back then, he wasn’t the only press baron cum tycoon with those initials bestriding business and politics in the UK. Robert Maxwell, the Czechoslovakian born, ex-Labour MP and owner of the Daily Record, Sunday Mail and Daily Mirror was the other big beast in the arena. Ebullient, highly opinionated and a great self-publicist, Maxwell was much the larger “personality” of the two and could always be relied on for good copy.

Robert Maxwell

In July 1986, Stewart McRobert interviewed him for the Sentinel. At the time, Maxwell had been brought in to chair the Commonwealth Games fund raising committee amid concerns that the Games, due to take place in Edinburgh later in the year, were heading for financial disaster. The bulk of the article concerned those funding problems and how they were being tackled, (in fact, according to Maxwell, they had already been largely solved thanks to his leadership).

Throughout the interview, Maxwell is in top form, grandly confident in himself and his abilities. Here’s just a wee snippet to convey the flavour of it:

Question: “Will the sporting success you have had with Oxford United [ he owned the football club] continue with these Games?

Answer: “Well, I am a winner and certainly intend that that shall be the case. That is in fact a good comparison and I thank you for reminding me about it.”

In the second half of the interview, the spotlight is turned on the newspaper industry. Maxwell is asked about Wapping and how the dispute could be resolved. Perhaps revealing the fundamental dissimilarity between him and the other RM, Maxwell opts for negotiation as the only way forward:

“I’ve always believed that this dispute can and must be resolved by an agreement between the trade unions and Mr Murdoch. There is no other way. In a free society you cannot have a total victory and a total vanquished. You have to have a compromise and a settlement.”

On the other hand, quizzed about whether the powers of the Press Council should be strengthened to shut down a paper “like the Sun” if it were found to have “made up stories”, he is agin it. “Our press is not perfect” he admits, but thinks investigation into malpractice “would be very difficult to do”.

Just over five years after this, Maxwell, his wealth and his reputation were no more. He died, in obscure circumstances, falling overboard from his yacht, in November 1991. After his death, his business empire quickly collapsed and it was found that he had siphoned off hundreds of millions of pounds from his employees pension funds to avoid bankruptcy.

To read the full article click here


ARCHIE SPEAKING…

Here we are again at the climax of another football season – championships, relegations, cup finals all getting decided – blanket coverage in the media of every twist and turn and controversy.

 In 1986 the Sentinel published an interview with Archie MacPherson, veteran commentator and Scottish football legend, a man with a brushover hairstyle that almost rivalled Donald Trump for carefully coiffeured weirdness.

 

Scotland were preparing to play in the World Cup Finals (remember those days) and it was a season when, hard to believe, there was NO football on the television. Archie shares his views on the pros and cons of that, football finances and the interests of players and fans.

 He gives us his opinion about the 1985-6 vintage Hearts and Hibs: “It’s good to have TWO good teams in the city”, tips Celtic over Rangers in the league and can’t imagine Aberdeen “will lose all that many games”.

This was during the time when Archie was also Rector of Edinburgh University and he expresses some forthright views about access to higher education for all and government cuts which are just as relevant today as they were then.

 You can read the full interview by clicking here Sentinel February 1986.


Panto In Wester Hailes: Oh yes it is!

Pantomime is both very British in its form and in its popularity at this time of year.  Traditionally performed at Christmas, pantomime has a history stretching right back to ancient Greece and Rome although its format has altered drastically over the centuries.  The forerunner of the modern pantomime can be found in the early 18th century where a performer called John Rich developed a production full of theatrical effects and comedy which became increasingly popular. 

Nowadays pantomime is big business with an array of greater and lesser known celebrities providing the entertainment.  Audience participation is as important a feature as the songs, dances, jokes and sometimes improbable plots.  Pantomime has always been popular and in recent years has been given greater recognition by other theatrical forms with award winning actors such as Sir Ian McKellan taking lead roles. 

1979 WH panto

 Pantomime has also traditionally been popular at a more local level, its form lending itself well to community performances.  The plot can include local references and jokes, and the format can include space for a diverse range of talents as well as a numerous cast.  Wester Hailes organised regular pantomimes over the years. 

In 1979 the Wester Hailes Community Festival Association organised and produced “A We’an in a Manger”.  An original pantomime written and performed by local residents, it proved to be a hit. 

1979 WH panto

 

         The Community Festival Association went on to organise a variety of performances and events throughout the years, often including pantomime during the Christmas period.  In 1984, the production was “Treasure Island”, one of the first performances by Bits ‘n’ Pieces, again with the emphasis on the community taking part as well as providing the audience. 

 As well as making sure these performances were publicised and promoted, the Sentinel gave space to the large productions happening in town.  In 1985 the Sentinel pulled off a scoop, gaining an interview with Stanley Baxter who had expressed reluctance about speaking directly to the press. You can read the full interview here: Stanley Baxter Sentinel interview.

Stanley Baxter 1985


2 Comments

Across The Political Spectrum

"Socialism In Our Time"

The Sentinel brought its readers vital local neighbourhood news and made sure that people living in Wester Hailes knew what was happening in their community. 

But the newspaper also had an outward focus, linking Wester Hailes to the issues and concerns of the wider world. 

"Happy At The Helm"

In one edition alone in January 1985, it managed to secure interviews from both ends of the political spectrum ,talking with both the  Secretary of State for Scotland, the Conservative MP George Younger, and the Labour MP Tony Benn

   Both interviews are given full-page coverage and provide an interesting contrast of views and styles of government.  You can read both interviews here: George Younger, Tony Benn.